Is the Word "Tranny" Offensive?
Apr. 11th, 2009 10:10 amSee also:
Is
(No one can see who voted on this, except for me. So you won't out yourself to everyone.)
(UPDATE: This poll is in no way scientific, and I had to write it before my laptop battery died, so I may have spent, at most, five minutes thinking about it. And 1:=not offensive, 10:=very offensive.)
[Poll #1381790]
Trannyand Subversivism: Re-reclaiming
Tranny(or not) part 1
Is
TrannyOffensive?
(No one can see who voted on this, except for me. So you won't out yourself to everyone.)
(UPDATE: This poll is in no way scientific, and I had to write it before my laptop battery died, so I may have spent, at most, five minutes thinking about it. And 1:=not offensive, 10:=very offensive.)
[Poll #1381790]
no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 02:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 06:27 pm (UTC)To be honest, I haven't seen "tranny" used as an insult all that often. (Not by any means saying I don't think it happens, just that I haven't been a witness to much of it.) To me, the word "tranny" just feels like a shortening of "transsexual" or "transgender(ed)"; if some bigot were going to try to insult a transperson, I suspect they'd use a term like "shemale" or "freak" or some such instead, and so I'd see the emotional loading as attaching to terms like that instead.
For the record, I don't think it would ever occur to me to refer to a transperson as "shemale".
no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 06:37 pm (UTC)So... I guess it IS offensive to me, but it's aurally offensive, not socially offensive.
just my thoughts..
Date: 2009-04-11 06:43 pm (UTC)as for terms- I'm not offended by the term 'transgendered', though I tend to think of persons who do not apply themselves to their phycisality as being fluidly gendered
*shrugs* it's how I'm wired- eventually humanity may get to a point where gender is moot, because no longer will [biological]females be the only ones to carry a child to term inside them, anyone who wants to experience that will be able to, but it will also come to a point where an (XY/XX) won't be a dictate to 'gender' assignment because that might also be a thing which can be adjusted, reassigned or even removed entirely in favor of a dual gendered species which is still fertile
Gods know I'd enjoy that day- the concept of a 'defined role' for a 'gender' has always been counter to my sense of what should be- what and who we are should not be defined by some outdated and outmoded sense of 'roles'-- we each are what and who we are, and we each should be allowed the chance to pursue what makes us happy
what brings us peace, and the outside physicality should not be a barrier to that
at least for me, but like I said- I don't think with the 'typical' mindstate as dictated by society
Re: just my thoughts..
Date: 2009-04-11 07:57 pm (UTC)This is something I find offensive.
Re: just my thoughts..
From:Re: just my thoughts..
From:Re: just my thoughts..
From:(no subject)
From:angry much?
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:28 pm (UTC)I believe "Racemicgender" is derived from "Racemic", which is a mixture which is of equal amounts of two substances, with the implication being obvious.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:52 pm (UTC)PS. Just want to say that I am enjoying hearing so much about you and from you. I'm glad to hear you found yourself again. I've wanted to participate in the discussion on not discussing your genitalia, but I am up to my own tits in hell right now. My job is not paying me and hasn't for weeks & I have maybe 100ish bucks staring down 1,000ish in bills never mind food and gas. Annnnnnd.... that dumb ass male I've been seeing is breaking my heart. I only just now got water back at my house after 2 weeks of foraging at the horse park for water to flush my toilets...
In all of this really super hard, hurty stuff I found solace in thinking back to one of my favorite moments with you... when we curled up to go to sleep in the bean bag in your living room after decompression. I was wrapped in your long, warm caring arms, my head against your shoulder. It felt really serene and sweet. A soft nest of gentle. I think as far as your parts go.... your arms are pretty cool.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 07:54 pm (UTC)As is your heart.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 08:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-11 11:44 pm (UTC)I'm not a fan of "tranny", not so much because of its historical use as an oppressive word, but for the same reason I'm sick of "trans" instead of "transgender"; it sounds to me like we're trying to hide the fact that we're talking about gender, like it's a euphemism because we're afraid to say the word "gender" or something. So I twitch a little when I hear it, because it just sounds like an ignorant word to use, but I'll also use it in kind of a joking tongue-in-cheek sorta way, or when talking to people who also use it comfortably, because I try not to do too much language-policing (I used to be a huge pain in the ass about that, and I've chilled way out about it).
I honestly dislike "cisgender" much more than I dislike "tranny", though, because I don't believe in labeling anybody with a label they don't identify with, and I don't know anybody who would fall under the definition of "cisgender" who would comfortably choose that term for themself. It also makes it sounds like "cisgender" is the "opposite" of "transgender", and I definitely don't have the experience that people who aren't transgender are the "opposite" of people who are.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 02:45 am (UTC)It doesn't bother me at all when trans people use the term -- it's sort of like when gay guys call each other faggot, or when black people call each other n****. It did startle me a bit when you used it though because it's not something I hear all that often.
Actually, I guess I do still say "tranny bar" when referring to something like AsiaSF, just because that's what those kind of places are called and I don't know another term for it. Maybe that's part of it. I associate the term with hypersexualized stripper and/or prostitute transgender people, and that's not how I want to describe someone who is transgender but not involved in those activities. It seems demeaning.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:25 am (UTC)As far as I'm concerned, it's a contraction, with no more malicious intent behind it than when someone refers to the differential of a car as a "diff".
Before anyone takes the "well, you're not a member of the group, so you've got a blind spot there" line of reasoning, allow me to point out that as a member of the outside group here, if the term was being used as an insult, it would be be very likely I'd have heard it used thus prior to this discussion.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:23 am (UTC)I am a woman. I like being a woman. I've been daydreaming about having kids and cleaning house since I was in 5th grade. In high school I lived for the times my mama would go down to see her parents for a week, and I got to run the household. Given a credit card paid for by my parents, I buy groceries and cleaning supplies. I read outdated ettiquete books for fun.
From this point of view... lumping all biologically happily gendered people into "cisgender" is vaguely offensive (now that I know what cisgendered means). Me? I'm cisgendered. A biological female, happy to be a female, who works on cars, likes computers, and never wants to have kids or be bothered with vacuuming? Not cisgendered. It's offensive in the same way feminism offends me. The word simply is not used to mean what it's supposed to mean. Feminism was supposed to empower women... Instead, it gave feminists a self-built moral high ground to despise women like me. Cisgendered is supposed to be a biological and social gender in agreement, but that doesn't neccesarily fit all non-trans people who are happy being non-trans.
I don't mean this to be offensive or anything, and I would certainly not hold using the word against anybody, but I just wanted to voice my opinions. Think about it or dismiss it as you would.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 05:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 05:54 pm (UTC)while i'd probably be labeled cis*, the last time i explained my gender to someone (a coworker, a few weeks ago), i said i am a (my first name, a common female name). which works for me, even though i'm not particularly "feminine".
since the way my gender plays out, i mostly get more privilege than i lose. i feel *i'd* be whining and detracting from others' realities to make an issue out of an unwanted label.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 06:19 pm (UTC)Um.
Date: 2009-04-12 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 10:57 pm (UTC)So no, I/we don't think that "tranny" is reclaimable any time soon.
OTOH, the term "tranny-chaser" used by transfolk is just as bad. We are attracted to trans people, so does that make us "tranny-chasers"? Or does being bigender ourselves give us a free pass out of that box? Trans-attracted people are individuals, and even if there is some kernel of truth to the negative stereotype of a "tranny-chaser", stereotyping is as unhelpful here as in any other context.