How many fingers am I holding up?

[foxgrrl]

Two more questions:

1. Are the following images too big, too small, or just right?
2. Do these two blocks of photos look exactly the same in your friends page style?

In my LJ style, the photos with hyperlinks anchored to them, appear with green borders. But otherwise they are laid out in the same number of columns and rows.

Because expanding the LJ-Cuts changes the style you're viewing this under to my [foxgrrl] default style. Click on this link to view this post in your own style:

http://foxgrrl.livejournal.com/55689.html?style=mine

Update 1:

I tweeked the HTML a bit, now it should look the same, except that the vertical line spacing is a bit different. (I'll deal with that later&hellip) Hopefully now it should wrap — that's the important part.

Update 2:

I found to problem with the borders; It was rather obvious in hindsight. Setting border=0 on the IMG tags did the trick. I'd been trying to set the border with style="border:0" and stuff on the <A> tags.

Photos without hyperlinks:

---

---

Photos with hyperlinks:

---

---

Comments

Same width with both sets here.

[wolfwings.livejournal.com]

I get small underscores between the images with hyperlinks due to your structure of:

<a href=>
  <img>
</a>

instead of

<a href=><img></a>

This is due to the whitespace (line feeds) not causing a spacing difference between the images since consecutive whitespace gets collapsed, but still triggering hyperlink styling on the whitespace in the former. The latter has no 'whitespace' inside the hyperlinks, so no underscores, but also looks identical to both of the existing for spacing between the images.

Re: Same width with both sets here.

[foxgrrl]

Oops, yeah, there is a spot of whitespace, that explains some stuff. I didn't expect it to have any effect, but it's in an anchor, so yeah it would.

I took the spaces out now. The borders overlap, but I've set those to 0px, with the style of "none", and the color black. So hopefully they don't show up as black boxes on non-black backgrounds. (Though, perhaps not a bad idea actually.)