Karyotypes

Aug. 23rd, 2008 08:36 pm
foxgrrl: (Default)
[personal profile] foxgrrl
People frequently ask me whether I have XX or XY [sex] chromosomes. I honestly don't know. I've never been tested. What chromosomes do you have? I mean they test everyone don't they? It sure seems like they tested everyone but me…
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-08-24 07:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faerie-gift.livejournal.com
I agree.

I don't know and haven't let it matter.

I've seen too many people obsess over it (especially online) and try and use it as a justification of their situation, saying they were "more this" or "more that" than other people because of it.

It just seems silly.



(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-08-24 04:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] varaviksne.livejournal.com
It is possible to be XY and female and able to bear children. Of course 1/4 of these pregnancies will miscarry (the YY's), another 1/4 will be XX females, and the remaining half will be XY. The XY's will be males unless they have the same genetic anomaly that made their mother female.

It is possible to be XX and male and be able to father children. All these children will be girls unless the mother was one of the XY's mentioned above, or they have the same genetic anomaly that made their father male.

Date: 2008-08-24 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ff00ff.livejournal.com
1/4 of these pregnancies will miscarry

I wonder where you found this factoid. It sounds weirdly incomparable to the number, 2/3, of fertilized zygotes in an XX woman which simply self abort. Unless the study doesn't count that baseline of self-aborting zygotes as miscarriages... I'm just saying it's a weird number, and I wonder where it comes from. The 2/3's figure is something I use against the pro-lifers when I want to smear their face in the fact that nature, or G-d if you will, is the greatest abortionist of all.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-08-24 04:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ff00ff.livejournal.com
Ah, Mendel Squares, yes I hadn't thought of it that way.

Date: 2008-08-24 05:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] varaviksne.livejournal.com
Um, yeah. I don't know what really would happen to a YY embryo but it clearly isn't viable given that X chromosomes carry lots of important genes.

This diversion is probably not quite what [livejournal.com profile] perlandria had in mind...
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-08-24 05:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] varaviksne.livejournal.com
Hmmm, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome , XX males are infertile, and according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swyer_syndrome , XY females are too. See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRY

However, someplace I read that the SRY gene works via a long sequence of other sex determining genes. It seems plausible that a problem elsewhere in that sequence could result in the affects I wrote above.

Date: 2008-08-24 07:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spider88.livejournal.com
There's no such thing as a Y ovum. YY isn't just unviable, but impossible.

Date: 2008-08-24 07:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spider88.livejournal.com
I thought XY females didn't have functional uteri nor ovum.

Date: 2008-08-24 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alcira.livejournal.com
I humbly apologize for the stupid intolerance and bigotry that affects humanity. The stupidity that makes people not know the difference between affect and effect. The stupidity that makes me wish I could walk around beating up stupid people all day. But I can't. Sigh.

Date: 2008-08-24 04:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ff00ff.livejournal.com
I haven't got a clue and have never been tested. The tone of your post is correct, who in gods name has ever been tested for that? My parents thought I would be a girl, the doctor said so, I don't think that back in 83 they determined that with a genetic test, they just squinted at the ultrasound, maybe I was just tucking it back then. Then again they did miss a twin brother as well so I imagine they weren't looking too hard at that ultrasound.

Date: 2008-08-24 05:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anaisdjuna.livejournal.com

I don't think they routinely test (for reasons of expense) esp. the age range of people you're asking here (for reasons of when some of us were born esp. those of us who will be ancient in a matter of days...)
;-).

Would be interesting to check out in your situation.

Date: 2008-08-24 05:08 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
Not only are most people never tested, but there area *lot* more possibilities than XX or XY. I think there are something like 16 different *viable* possibilities for that chromosome "pair" (pair in quotes because some of them are triplets).

Add in stuff like Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (full or partial) which are controlled by genes on other chromosomes and simple "sex" (in the biological sense) is a lot more complicated than most folks are willing to deal with.

Throw gender and orientation into the mix and it's a real mess. Not that these idiots would sit still long enough to be told about all of it.

And, alas, if they did listen, most of them would refuse to *believe* it.
Even the parts dealing with pure biology.

Date: 2008-08-24 05:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com
I've got a friend who could honestly answer that "yes" -- Klinefelter's Mosaic; which genes turn up depends on where you take the sample, or so I understand it.

Date: 2008-08-24 05:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bluegodjanus.livejournal.com
I didn't realise there were multiple options. Being boy-typed, I always assumed I was XY.

Date: 2008-08-24 05:46 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
Having a male type body is *usually* XY. But it can also be XYY and several other things.

Female looking boding can be a lot of things, including XY (with any of several "defects" on other chromosome pairs).

Date: 2008-08-24 09:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yetanotherbob.livejournal.com
Same here, being non-trans. (Token completely normal white guy*, at your service!) So it's mostly assumed a 1:1 situation. Oversimplistic given the other possibilities given, but as a model, it's a useful when there's little to override it: "Got equipment that allows you to easily use a urinal? Okay, don't use the door with the picture of someone in a skirt, consider yourself an XY, and become the target of advertisements of blue pills. Next!"

*Token completely normal white guy might not be normal and/or white.

Date: 2008-08-24 06:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hasufin.livejournal.com
Makes me wonder what will turn up once gene assays become common practice.

Of course, bearing in mind that people don't actually expect that such checking to have been performed, the basic question is some variant of "Are you trans?". And what is the polite way to ask that? I imagine most transgendered folks are likely inured to such questions, but I can easily see someone who is cisgendered taking offense.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-08-24 03:18 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-08-24 05:31 pm (UTC)
ext_300726: Dragon talons holding cup of tea. (genepulser)
From: [identity profile] dragonzuela.livejournal.com
Actually, in birds, Lepidopterans, and other animals in which females are the heterogametic sex, the sex chromosomes are called W and Z instead of X and Y.

(Heterogametic meaning one individual having two different sex chromosomes, which in humans is XY. Homogametic = XX)

/nerdery

Date: 2008-08-25 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tlttlotd.livejournal.com
Speaking of, are you heading out with the rest of us in four years' time? P)

Date: 2008-08-29 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oygevalte.livejournal.com
How third dimensional of you. The rest of us just come up flat...

Thank you, thank you, we hope you enjoyed tonight's Cartesian humor. The 9 pm show is completely different from the 7 pm show, and have a great night, folks!

*hides* :D

Date: 2008-08-24 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robocoon.livejournal.com
You could always do what I do-- when I get "the question", I just look them dead in the eye and say "Neither. I'm a robot."

Date: 2008-08-25 04:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chipuni.livejournal.com
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.

Date: 2008-08-29 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oygevalte.livejournal.com
Just arrested for uranium smuggling, were you? :D

Date: 2008-08-24 05:36 pm (UTC)
ext_300726: Dragon talons holding cup of tea. (genepulser)
From: [identity profile] dragonzuela.livejournal.com
If someone had amniocentesis while in the womb to be checked for Down Syndrome or other chromosomal disorders, they'd have had their karyotype tested. Or perhaps later in life if they were infertile or showing signs of a known chromosomal disorder they'd have their karyotype done. Otherwise, um yeah, no need to pay a doctor to check that your genes match your junk.

I second what someone else said, that these people are just struggling to find a polite way to ask you if you're trans.

Date: 2008-08-24 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mayamaia.livejournal.com
And of course there are other options. XXY and X, XX but with the gene that causes male development...

Date: 2008-08-24 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] criollo.livejournal.com
Ugh, I can't believe the audacity of people. I'm sorry they are so rude. It's none of their business.

Date: 2008-08-24 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shizouka.livejournal.com
Till the next great enlightenment, we'll still get people asking this stuff. All for the same reason that they want people to slide into these neat little slots of either A or B.

Date: 2008-08-25 12:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tlttlotd.livejournal.com
When I participated in a medical research study some years ago, they sampled my blood a number of times for hormonal assay as well as genetic research. I don't know what, if anything they found because they never saw fit to get back to me.

Date: 2008-08-25 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kitten-goddess.livejournal.com
Why do people even ask? That is extremely rude. *swats nearest asshole upside the head with a heavy object*
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-08-29 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oygevalte.livejournal.com
Heh, I suppose thinking of gender as a wave function makes a lot of sense, rather than it being "granualr". :D

Date: 2008-08-25 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tastyeagle.livejournal.com
I would love to have mine tested. I actually would love frequent testing of all sorts of internal chemical and biological variables and constants. It satisfies the scientist in me to keep track of what I am made of and how things change over time.

Of course, what stops me from doing that is the high costs of all these tests.

Profile

foxgrrl: (Default)
foxgrrl

May 2023

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 22nd, 2026 06:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios